The ordinance doesn’t prohibit “engaging in pay day loan tasks” during nighttime hours; it claims that the company may not be available

The ordinance doesn’t prohibit “engaging in pay day loan tasks” during nighttime hours; it claims that the company may not be available

Plaintiff asserted a claim of breach of due procedure, however it rests on a single ground as their equal security declare that the ordinance does not have any basis that is rational.

Plaintiff isn’t asserting it was rejected any procedural liberties to which it had been entitled. Consequently, its due process claim falls using its protection that is equal claim. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456, 470 n. 12, 101 S. Ct. 715, 66 L. Ed. 2d 659 (1981) (“From our summary under equal security, but, it follows a fortiori that the ban on synthetic nonreturnable milk containers will not break the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause: National Paint, 45 F.3d at 1129 refusing to take into account declare that ordinance violates substantive due procedure liberties; financial regulation should be examined under equal security maxims”); see additionally Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. 266, 273, 114 S. Ct. 807, 127 L. Ed. 2d 114 (1994) (“Where a specific amendment `provides an explicit textual source of constitutional security’ against a certain type of federal government behavior, ‘ that amendment, perhaps not the greater general idea of substantive due procedure, should be the guide for analyzing these claims.'”)

*806 C. Vagueness

Plaintiff argues that the ordinance will not supply the “person of ordinary intelligence an opportunity that is reasonable know what is forbidden, to ensure that he might work consequently.” Grayned v. Read More